Skip to content
Everyfolio

Market mechanics

Diversification, mechanically

By Keven Laverdière, Everyfolio

Updated on 2026-08-25

Read by a synthetic voice — playback continues with the screen off.
≈ 73 min of listening, one article after another.

"Don't put all your eggs in one basket" is the oldest saying in finance — but behind the adage there is also a precise mechanism. This article describes that mechanism, in numbers and on fictional securities. It does not say how many baskets you need: it shows what baskets do.

Correlation — the word that decides everything

Two securities are correlated when they tend to move together; they are weakly correlated when their movements are largely independent. It is correlation, not the number of securities, that does the work:

  • holding ten securities that rise and fall together means holding the same risk ten times — the adage is respected to the letter and betrayed in substance;
  • holding two securities whose ups and downs do not coincide already smooths something: when one falls, the other does not necessarily fall at the same moment.

Diversification reduces specific risk — the risk particular to one company. It normally does nothing against market risk: when everything falls together, the baskets fall together.

Concentration — the other side

Concentration is the mirror image: the heavier a position weighs, the more the portfolio's fate depends on a single event. A 50% position that loses 40% costs the whole portfolio 20%; the same loss on a 5% position costs 2%. The arithmetic is brutal and symmetrical — concentration also amplifies successes. That is a fact of structure, not a judgment.

A neutral worked example

Two fictional portfolios of $10,000, two securities each. Security A loses 30% in a year; security B, weakly correlated, gains 6%.

  1. Concentrated: 90% in A, 10% in B. Result: (9,000 × −30%) + (1,000 × +6%) = −$2,640, or −26.4%.
  2. Spread out: 50% in A, 50% in B. Result: (5,000 × −30%) + (5,000 × +6%) = −$1,200, or −12.0%.
  3. Same market, same securities: only the allocation differs, and the gap is 14.4 points. Had A gained 30%, the order would be reversed — the concentrated portfolio would have gained more.

Diversification "predicted" nothing: it reduced dependence on the fate of a single security, in both directions.

What this changes for your tracking

Everyfolio's allocation column (the weight of each position, in %) is the raw data of concentration: it shows who weighs what. The app describes that allocation — the correlation between your securities is not visible in a position table, and no level of allocation is suggested there.

Informative, general content — not personalized advice. For your situation: your institution or an advisor.

A question about this topic?

Something unclear, a problem you ran into, a suggestion: write to us.

Ask a question

We explain mechanisms: we cannot answer about your personal situation, or say what to buy or sell. For that, your institution or an advisor. Do not include statements, account numbers, or credentials.

Understand your portfolio. Learn to invest.

An account lets you mark what you have read, answer the challenges and follow the path. Reading requires nothing.